Action-State Semantics for Practical Reasoning

نویسندگان

  • Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
  • Katie Atkinson
چکیده

There are two aspects of practical reasoning which present particular difficulties for current approaches to modelling practical reasoning through argumentation: temporal aspects, and the intrinsic worth of actions. Time is important because actions change the state of the world, we need to consider future states as well as past and present ones. Equally, it is often not what we do but the way that we do it that matters: the same future state may be reachable either through desirable or undesirable actions, and often also actions are done for their own sake rather than for the sake of their consequences. In this paper we will present a semantics for practical reasoning, based on a formalisation developed originally for reasoning about commands, in which actions and states are treated as of equal status. We will show how using these semantics facilitates the handling of the temporal aspects of practical reasoning, and enables, where appropriate, justification of actions without reference to their consequences.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Reasoning with Actions

Action semantics is a semantic description framework with very good pragmatic properties but a rather weak theory for reasoning about programs. A strong action theory would be of great practical use, however. It would make it possible to reason about the large class of programming languages that can be described in action semantics. This paper develops the foundations for a richer action theory...

متن کامل

Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning ( corrected version ) 1

This paper proposes an argument-based semantics for combined epistemic and practical reasoning, taking seriously the idea that in certain contexts epistemic reasoning is sceptical while practical reasoning is credulous. The new semantics combines grounded and preferred semantics. A dialectical proof theory is defined which is sound and complete with respect to this semantics and which combines ...

متن کامل

Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning

This paper proposes an argument-based semantics for combined epistemic and practical reasoning, taking seriously the idea that in certain contexts epistemic reasoning is sceptical while practical reasoning is credulous. The new semantics combines grounded and preferred semantics. A dialectical proof theory is defined which is sound and complete with respect to this semantics and which combines ...

متن کامل

Integrating Action Calculi and AgentSpeak: Closing the Gap

Existing action calculi provide rich, declarative formalisms for reasoning about actions. BDI-based programming languages like AgentSpeak, on the other hand, are procedural and geared towards practical applications of cognitive agents. In this paper, we close the gap between these two lines of research by integrating action calculi and AgentSpeak programs. Specifically, we develop a new and pur...

متن کامل

A Semantics for Means-end Relations

There has been relatively much work on practical reasoning in philosophy and artificial intelligence. Typically, such reasoning includes premises regarding means-end relations, but the semantics of such relations is not clear. In this paper, we provide a formal semantics for means-end relations, in particular for necessary and sufficient means-end relations. Our semantics includes a non-monoton...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009